GreenhillGorilla1
|
Birstall stamford aIs it correct that our game vs birstall stamford is to be replayed due to them fielding players not signed on? If I'm wrong I do appologise someone may be on the wind-up!
|
Ace_Striker
|
Can't say I have heard that but if it's true I think u get the points and they get a fine?
|
wvfcgaffer
|
Ive the same thing about birstall res ? can we get our game replayed ?????
|
Matt1988
|
| wvfcgaffer wrote: | | Ive the same thing about birstall res ? can we get our game replayed ????? |
ive heard that youve been playing a keeper that wasnt signed on for your 1st two games. haha
|
Ace_Striker
|
Birstall res as well, haha interesting!
|
dr chan
|
stamford have 128 signed on why would they play ringers ?? saying that 2 weeks ago one off there lads rang a player off mine up to play for the first team who is signed for us !!!!! saying that hes one hell off a player so cant fault them !!!
|
wvfcgaffer
|
| Matt1988 wrote: | | wvfcgaffer wrote: | | Ive the same thing about birstall res ? can we get our game replayed ????? |
ive heard that youve been playing a keeper that wasnt signed on for your 1st two games. haha |
Whos that then ?
one of our old players whos retired but still signed on played 1st game, our striker played 2nd game and our regular keeper came back last week .
|
birstallstamfordanumber1
|
I doubt this very very much pal, somebody is definitely winding you up. We have plenty of players ALL of which are signed on.
|
Celtic_Steve
|
Re: Birstall stamford a | GreenhillGorilla1 wrote: | | Is it correct that our game vs birstall stamford is to be replayed due to them fielding players not signed on? If I'm wrong I do appologise someone may be on the wind-up! |
This is not correct.
|
wvfcgaffer
|
im not saying its true, just what i was told mate
|
Matt B
|
Stewards Enquiry. Just report them to the league. You win the game if it is a cup game? If its a league game they will be a fine and poss points deduction but you will probably have to play them again
|
birstallstamfordanumber1
|
Matt b, why dont you read the posts before you reply to them......its not true, as stated.
Just another feeble attempt to knock us off our perch.Leave it to the football on the pitch lads, whoever started these silly rumours obviously has too much time on their hands.
|
daftlad
|
| birstallstamfordanumber1 wrote: | Matt b, why dont you read the posts before you reply to them......its not true, as stated.
Just another feeble attempt to knock us off our perch.Leave it to the football on the pitch lads, whoever started these silly rumours obviously has too much time on their hands. |
i agree with you! looking forward to playing you lot, alot. we certainly need to pull our fingers out & start playing like how we finished last season.
|
GreenhillGorilla1
|
If it is wrong I do appologise not trying to wind anyone up by it, it's just what I was told so thought id ask the question.
|
Matt B
|
What a surpise Stamford - Dummy. Grow up!!!!!
|
Matt B
|
Infact if YOU take the time to read it, the reference to it not being correct was made by Steve. This was in relation to the statement made by Greenhill in relation to a replay. NOT necessarily Stamford using unsigned players. So get off your soapbox
|
Celtic_Steve
|
Just to clarify:
It is not true that Birstall Stamford A will have to replay Greenhill because Birstall fielded ineligible players.
GreenhillGorilla - I know you're not trying to wind anyone up. You heard something and asked for clarification - I answered - no worries.
Nick and Matt - leave it out.
|
|
|
